A topic from the subject of Calibration in Chemistry.

Uncertainty of Measurement in Calibration

Calibration is the process of comparing a measuring instrument's readings to a known standard to determine its accuracy. However, no measurement is perfectly precise. Every measurement is subject to some degree of uncertainty. This uncertainty arises from various sources and affects the reliability of the calibration process.

Sources of Uncertainty

Several factors contribute to uncertainty in calibration:

  • Instrument Resolution: The smallest increment that the instrument can display limits the precision of the measurement. For example, a ruler with millimeter markings cannot measure to a hundredth of a millimeter.
  • Environmental Factors: Temperature, humidity, and pressure can influence instrument readings and introduce uncertainty. Variations in these factors must be controlled or accounted for during calibration.
  • Operator Error: Human factors, such as parallax error (reading a scale at an angle), improper handling, or incorrect data recording, can significantly impact measurement accuracy.
  • Instrument Drift: Over time, instruments may experience a gradual change in their readings, known as drift. Regular calibration helps detect and mitigate the effects of drift.
  • Calibration Standard Uncertainty: The reference standard used for calibration itself has an associated uncertainty. This uncertainty propagates to the measurements made with the calibrated instrument.
  • Method Uncertainty: The specific calibration procedure used also introduces uncertainty. Different methods may have different levels of accuracy.

Expressing Uncertainty

Calibration results should always include an expression of uncertainty. This is typically represented as a range of values around the measured value, often expressed as a ± value (plus or minus). For example, a measurement reported as 10.0 ± 0.1 units indicates that the true value is likely to fall between 9.9 and 10.1 units.

Importance of Uncertainty Assessment

Understanding and quantifying uncertainty in calibration is crucial for several reasons:

  • Ensuring Measurement Quality: Accurate assessment of uncertainty helps determine the reliability and trustworthiness of measurement results.
  • Traceability: Uncertainty assessment contributes to the traceability of measurements to national or international standards.
  • Compliance with Standards: Many regulatory standards and industry best practices require the reporting of measurement uncertainty.
  • Decision Making: Knowledge of uncertainty helps in making informed decisions based on the measurements obtained.

Conclusion

Uncertainty is an inherent part of any measurement, including those made during calibration. By understanding the sources of uncertainty and properly quantifying them, we can improve the quality and reliability of our measurements and ensure that our instruments are performing within acceptable limits.

Uncertainty of Measurement in Calibration
Key Points:
  • Uncertainty is an estimate of the range of values within which the true value is likely to be found.
  • Calibration is the process of determining the relationship between a measurement instrument and a known reference standard.
  • Uncertainty in calibration can arise from a variety of sources, including instrument error, environmental conditions, and operator error.
  • It is important to consider the uncertainty of measurement when interpreting calibration results.
Main Concepts:

Uncertainty of measurement is a fundamental concept in chemistry that must be considered when interpreting any measurement result. Calibration is a process that helps to minimize uncertainty by establishing a relationship between a measurement instrument and a known reference standard. However, even after calibration, there will always be some degree of uncertainty associated with any measurement.

The sources of uncertainty in calibration can be classified into three main categories:

  1. Instrument error: This refers to the inherent accuracy and precision limitations of the measurement instrument itself. This includes factors such as resolution, linearity, and hysteresis.
  2. Environmental conditions: These can significantly affect the accuracy of the measurement. Examples include temperature fluctuations, humidity variations, pressure changes, and vibrations.
  3. Operator error: This encompasses mistakes made by the person operating the measurement instrument. This can include incorrect reading of the instrument, improper handling, and mistakes in the calibration procedure itself.

Quantifying uncertainty is crucial. Methods like the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) provide a framework for determining the combined uncertainty from these various sources. This combined uncertainty is typically expressed as a standard uncertainty (a standard deviation) and a confidence interval (e.g., 95%).

It is important to consider the uncertainty of measurement when interpreting calibration results. The uncertainty should be reported along with the measurement result, and it should be taken into account when making decisions based on the data. Failing to account for uncertainty can lead to inaccurate conclusions and potentially flawed experimental results.

Uncertainty of Measurement in Calibration Experiment
Objective

To determine the uncertainty of measurement in the calibration of a 100 mL volumetric flask.

Materials
  • 100 mL Volumetric flask
  • Analytical balance (capable of measuring to at least 0.001g)
  • 10 mL Pipette (optional, for more accurate water dispensing)
  • Distilled water
  • Wash bottle
Procedure
  1. Thoroughly clean and dry the volumetric flask. Ensure no water droplets remain on the inside.
  2. Weigh the empty, dry volumetric flask on the analytical balance and record the mass (m1). Record the measurement to the precision of the balance.
  3. Using a suitable method (e.g., pipette or carefully filling to the mark), fill the flask with distilled water to the calibration mark at eye level. Avoid trapping air bubbles.
  4. Weigh the flask containing the distilled water and record the mass (m2). Record the measurement to the precision of the balance.
  5. Calculate the mass of the water (m3) by subtracting m1 from m2: m3 = m2 - m1
  6. Repeat steps 2-5 at least five times (n ≥ 5) to obtain multiple measurements.
  7. Calculate the average mass of water (m̄) by summing all the masses of water (m3i) and dividing by the number of trials (n): m̄ = Σ(m3i) / n
  8. Calculate the standard deviation (σ) of the masses of water using the formula:
    σ = √( Σ(m3i - m̄)² / (n-1) )
          
  9. Calculate the relative uncertainty (u) of the measurement using the formula:
    u = (σ / m̄) * 100% 
          
    (Expressing as a percentage is standard practice for relative uncertainty)
Results

The following table shows example results of the experiment. Your results will vary.

Trial # Mass of empty flask (m1) (g) Mass of flask and water (m2) (g) Mass of water (m3) (g)
1 100.000 199.998 99.998
2 100.002 200.001 99.999
3 100.001 200.000 99.999
4 100.003 200.002 99.999
5 100.001 200.000 99.999

Example Calculations (based on table above):

m̄ = (99.998 + 99.999 + 99.999 + 99.999 + 99.999) / 5 = 99.999 g

σ = (using the formula from step 8) ≈ 0.0004 g

u = (0.0004 g / 99.999 g) * 100% ≈ 0.0004 %

Significance

Understanding uncertainty of measurement is crucial in calibration. It quantifies the reliability of the volumetric flask's 100 mL mark. The smaller the relative uncertainty, the more precise the calibration. This uncertainty must be considered when using the flask in subsequent experiments to ensure accurate results.

Share on: