Back to Library

(AI-Powered Suggestions)

Related Topics

A topic from the subject of Calibration in Chemistry.

  • 11 months ago
  • 6 min read
Types of Calibration: Absolute and Comparative
Introduction

Calibration is a fundamental procedure in chemistry that involves comparing the response of a measurement device to a known standard. This process ensures accurate and reliable measurements by determining the relationship between the device's output and the true value of the analyte being measured.

Basic Concepts
  • Analyte: The substance being measured.
  • Measurement Device: The device used to measure the analyte.
  • Standard: A reference material with a known concentration or value.
  • Calibration Curve: A graphical representation of the relationship between the device's response and the known standard values.
Equipment and Techniques

Calibration requires specialized equipment and techniques depending on the type of measurement device and the analyte being measured. Common equipment includes:

  • Spectrophotometers
  • pH meters
  • Titration equipment

Calibration techniques involve:

  • Preparing standard solutions of known concentrations.
  • Measuring the device's response to each standard.
  • Plotting a calibration curve and determining the equation of the curve.
Types of Calibration

There are two main types of calibration:

Absolute Calibration

In absolute calibration, the device's response is directly compared to the true value of the analyte in a known standard. This type of calibration is used when accurate traceability to a primary or secondary reference material is required. Absolute calibration is typically performed by:

  • Using a certified reference material (CRM)
  • Performing a gravimetric analysis
  • Using electrochemical techniques
Comparative Calibration

In comparative calibration, the device's response is compared to that of a similar device that has been calibrated previously. This type of calibration is less accurate than absolute calibration but is often more convenient and cost-effective. Comparative calibration is typically performed by:

  • Using a standard curve created from a calibrated device
  • Comparing the device's response to a reference solution
Types of Experiments

The types of experiments used for calibration vary depending on the analyte and measurement device. Common experiments include:

  • Spectrophotometric Calibration: Measuring the absorbance of known concentrations of a colored analyte.
  • pH Calibration: Measuring the pH of known solutions and creating a calibration curve for a pH meter.
  • Titration Calibration: Determining the equivalence point of a titration by using a known standard solution.
Data Analysis

The data obtained from calibration experiments is analyzed to determine the relationship between the device's response and the true value of the analyte. This relationship is often expressed as a calibration equation or calibration curve. The equation or curve is then used to convert future measurement responses to analyte concentrations.

Applications

Calibration is essential in various fields of chemistry, including:

  • Analytical Chemistry: Quantifying the concentration of analytes in samples.
  • Pharmaceutical Chemistry: Measuring the purity and potency of drugs.
  • Environmental Chemistry: Analyzing pollutants and contaminants in the environment.
  • Food Chemistry: Determining the nutritional value and safety of food products.
Conclusion

Calibration is a crucial procedure in chemistry that ensures accurate and reliable measurements. By understanding the types of calibration, equipment, techniques, and data analysis involved, chemists can effectively calibrate their measurement devices to obtain accurate results.

Types of Calibration: Absolute and Comparative
Absolute Calibration

Absolute calibration is a method of determining the exact value of a measuring instrument's output by comparing it to a known standard. This standard is typically a highly accurate and traceable reference. The process involves directly measuring the quantity being calibrated using the reference standard and then adjusting the instrument to match. This ensures the instrument's readings are directly traceable to a fundamental unit of measurement.

Examples:

  • Calibrating a thermometer against a known boiling or freezing point of water.
  • Using a calibrated weight to check the accuracy of a balance.
  • Verifying the accuracy of a pressure gauge against a precision pressure standard.

Advantages: Highly accurate, directly traceable to standards, independent of other instruments.

Disadvantages: Can be expensive and time-consuming, requires access to precise standards.

Comparative Calibration

Comparative calibration, also known as relative calibration, involves comparing the instrument's readings to those of another instrument that has already been calibrated. The calibrated instrument serves as a reference for adjusting the instrument being calibrated. This method is often more convenient and less expensive than absolute calibration but sacrifices some accuracy.

Examples:

  • Calibrating a new pH meter against a previously calibrated pH meter.
  • Comparing the readings of two spectrophotometers using the same sample.
  • Using a calibrated flow meter to check the accuracy of another flow meter.

Advantages: More convenient and less expensive than absolute calibration, less demanding in terms of equipment.

Disadvantages: Accuracy depends on the accuracy of the reference instrument, introduces potential for accumulated errors.

Summary Table
Feature Absolute Calibration Comparative Calibration
Reference Known standard (traceable to fundamental units) Previously calibrated instrument
Accuracy High Moderate (dependent on reference instrument)
Cost High Low
Time Long Short
Traceability Direct Indirect
Experiment: Types of Calibration: Absolute and Comparative
Introduction:

Calibration is the process of determining the relationship between the response of a measuring instrument and the corresponding value of the measurand. There are two main types of calibration: absolute and comparative. Absolute calibration involves directly comparing the instrument's readings to known standards, establishing a direct relationship. Comparative calibration, on the other hand, involves comparing the instrument's readings to the readings of a known, calibrated instrument or standard.

Objective:

To demonstrate the principles of absolute and comparative calibration using an analytical balance and a pH meter.

Materials:
  • Analytical balance
  • Set of standard weights (e.g., 1g, 2g, 5g, 10g)
  • pH meter
  • Buffer solutions (e.g., pH 4, pH 7, pH 10)
  • Unknown weight for absolute calibration
  • Unknown solution for comparative calibration
  • Distilled water (for rinsing)
Procedure:
Absolute Calibration (using the analytical balance):
  1. Zero the analytical balance. Ensure it is properly leveled and free from vibrations.
  2. Place a known standard weight (e.g., 1g) on the balance pan.
  3. Record the balance reading. Note any discrepancies and repeat if necessary.
  4. Repeat steps 2 and 3 for each standard weight in the set.
  5. Plot a graph of the balance readings (y-axis) versus the known weights (x-axis).
  6. Determine the equation of the best-fit line through the plotted points. The slope represents the sensitivity of the balance (ideally close to 1), and the y-intercept represents any systematic error.
  7. Weigh the unknown weight using the balance. Use the equation of the best-fit line to correct for any systematic error and determine the actual weight.
Comparative Calibration (using the pH meter):
  1. Calibrate the pH meter using at least two standard buffer solutions (e.g., pH 4 and pH 7). Follow the manufacturer's instructions carefully.
  2. Rinse the pH probe with distilled water between measurements.
  3. Measure the pH of the unknown solution.
  4. Compare the measured pH of the unknown solution to a known pH value (if available). Determine the difference, which represents the error in the measurement.
  5. If a known pH for the unknown solution is not available, a different comparative calibration could be performed by comparing measurements taken with the calibrated pH meter against measurements taken using another calibrated pH meter as the standard.
Results:

Record all balance readings and their corresponding standard weights for the absolute calibration. For comparative calibration, record the pH readings of the buffer solutions and the unknown solution. Include the equation of the best-fit line obtained for the absolute calibration graph and any calculations made to determine the weight of the unknown and the error in the pH measurement. Present your data in clear tables and graphs.

Discussion:

Analyze the results obtained from both absolute and comparative calibration methods. Discuss the accuracy and precision of the measurements. Identify any sources of error and suggest improvements to the experimental procedure. Compare and contrast the advantages and disadvantages of each calibration method. Explain the significance of calibration in ensuring reliable and accurate measurements in chemistry.

Share on: