Back to Library

(AI-Powered Suggestions)

Related Topics

A topic from the subject of Calibration in Chemistry.

  • 1 year ago
  • 9 min read

Calibration and Measurement Uncertainty

Introduction

Calibration is the process of comparing a measuring instrument's readings to a known standard to ensure accuracy. Measurement uncertainty is the doubt associated with any measurement result, representing the range of values within which the true value is likely to lie. Understanding and quantifying uncertainty is crucial for reliable experimental results and data analysis.

Sources of Measurement Uncertainty

Several factors contribute to measurement uncertainty. These include:

  • Instrument limitations: Resolution, accuracy, and precision of the measuring instrument.
  • Environmental factors: Temperature, humidity, pressure, and other environmental conditions affecting the measurement.
  • Human error: Mistakes in reading the instrument, operating the equipment, or recording the data.
  • Methodological uncertainties: Limitations inherent in the measurement method itself.
  • Sample limitations: Inhomogeneity of the sample, insufficient sample size.

Expressing Measurement Uncertainty

Measurement uncertainty is typically expressed as a range of values, often using standard deviation or confidence intervals. The reported value is typically given as:

Measured Value ± Uncertainty

For example, a measurement reported as 10.0 ± 0.2 g indicates that the true value is likely to be between 9.8 g and 10.2 g.

Calibration Procedures

Calibration involves several steps:

  1. Selecting a standard: Choosing a reference standard with known and traceable accuracy.
  2. Comparing the instrument to the standard: Measuring a series of known values using both the instrument and the standard.
  3. Analyzing the results: Determining the deviation between the instrument's readings and the standard's values.
  4. Adjusting the instrument (if necessary): Correcting the instrument's readings to minimize deviations.
  5. Documenting the calibration: Recording the calibration results, including any adjustments made, and the date of the calibration.

Importance of Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis

Accurate calibration and proper uncertainty analysis are essential for:

  • Ensuring the reliability and validity of experimental results.
  • Improving the quality of products and processes.
  • Meeting regulatory requirements.
  • Facilitating accurate comparison of data from different sources.
  • Reducing errors and improving efficiency.
Calibration and Measurement Uncertainty in Chemistry

Calibration is the process of determining the relationship between the response of a measuring instrument and the value of the measurand being measured.
Measurement uncertainty is a measure of the doubt associated with a measurement result.

Key Points:

  • Calibration is essential to ensure that measuring instruments are providing accurate and reliable measurements.
  • Measurement uncertainty is inherent in all measurements and cannot be completely eliminated.
  • The uncertainty of a measurement result can be estimated using a variety of methods, including statistical analysis, propagation of uncertainty, and expert judgment.
  • Measurement uncertainty should be reported along with measurement results to provide users with a complete understanding of the reliability of the data.

Main Concepts:

Calibration methods: There are a variety of calibration methods available, including:

  • Linear calibration: This is the most common calibration method and it involves fitting a straight line to the data points obtained from a series of measurements.
  • Nonlinear calibration: This method is used when the relationship between the response of the measuring instrument and the value of the measurand is not linear. Examples include polynomial or exponential fits.
  • Multivariate calibration: This method is used when the response of the measuring instrument is affected by multiple factors. This often involves techniques like Principal Component Regression (PCR) or Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR).

Sources of measurement uncertainty: There are a number of sources of measurement uncertainty, including:

  • Instrumental uncertainty: This is the uncertainty associated with the measuring instrument itself, including resolution, repeatability, and drift.
  • Environmental uncertainty: This is the uncertainty caused by changes in the environment in which the measurement is made, such as temperature, pressure, or humidity.
  • Operator uncertainty: This is the uncertainty caused by the person performing the measurement, including variations in technique and interpretation.
  • Sample uncertainty: This is the uncertainty associated with the sample being measured, including inhomogeneity and sampling errors.
  • Method uncertainty: This relates to the inherent limitations of the measurement method itself.

Methods for estimating measurement uncertainty: There are a number of methods available for estimating measurement uncertainty, including:

  • Statistical analysis: This method uses statistical techniques such as calculating standard deviations and confidence intervals to estimate the uncertainty of a measurement result.
  • Propagation of uncertainty (GUM): This method uses mathematical techniques based on the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) to estimate the uncertainty of a measurement result based on the uncertainty of the input quantities and their relationships.
  • Expert judgment: This method uses the knowledge and experience of experts to estimate the uncertainty of a measurement result, often used when other methods are insufficient.
Calibration and Measurement Uncertainty
Experiment: Calibrating a Graduated Cylinder using a Pipette
Objective: To demonstrate the importance of calibration and measurement uncertainty in analytical chemistry.
Materials:
  • 100 mL graduated cylinder
  • 10 mL pipette
  • Distilled water
  • Analytical balance
  • Calculator

Procedure:
  1. Calibrate the Graduated Cylinder: Using the analytical balance, weigh a small, known mass of distilled water (e.g., 50 g). Record the mass with the appropriate significant figures and units.
  2. Carefully transfer the weighed water into the graduated cylinder. Read the water level to the nearest 0.1 mL. Record this volume with the appropriate significant figures and units.
  3. Divide the mass of the water by its volume to determine the density of water at room temperature. Record this calculated density with the appropriate significant figures and units. Note the room temperature.
  4. Compare the measured density to the accepted value for the density of water at the recorded temperature (look up this value in a reference source). Calculate the percent error using the formula below.
  5. Repeat steps 1-4 using different volumes of water (e.g., 25g, 75g) at least three times to assess the precision of the graduated cylinder. Record all data with appropriate significant figures and units.

Data Analysis:
  • Calculate the percent error in the density measurement for each trial using the following formula:

    Percent Error = |Measured Density - Accepted Density| / Accepted Density × 100

  • Determine the measurement uncertainty by calculating the standard deviation of the repeated density measurements. Report this with the appropriate significant figures and units.

Significance:

This experiment highlights the following aspects of calibration and measurement uncertainty:

  • The importance of using calibrated equipment and proper techniques to ensure reliable measurements.
  • The unavoidable presence of measurement uncertainty due to limitations in instruments, experimental conditions, and human error.
  • The need to quantify measurement uncertainty to evaluate the accuracy and precision of analytical data.
  • The influence of measurement uncertainty on the interpretation of experimental results and decision-making processes.

Discussion:
  • Discuss the factors that could affect the accuracy and precision of the calibration and measurement process (e.g., temperature fluctuations, parallax error in reading the meniscus, balance calibration, pipette calibration, cleanliness of glassware). Quantify these uncertainties where possible.
  • Explore the implications of measurement uncertainty in various analytical applications (e.g., drug analysis, environmental monitoring, quality control). How might measurement uncertainty affect the outcome or interpretation in these applications?
  • Emphasize the importance of uncertainty estimation and reporting in scientific research and decision-making. Why is this crucial for the reproducibility and reliability of scientific findings?

Share on: